Legal Opinion

Grimes v. . Holmes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto, brought by the Attorney-General of the State of North Carolina on the complaint of the relator, a citizen of this State, and a resident, taxpayer, and qualified voter of the city of Salisbury, to oust the defendant from the office of city councilman of the city of Salisbury, on the ground that defendant now unlawfully and wrongfully holds and exercises said office. C. S., 870 (1)-871.

The agreed statement of facts is as follows: "(1) That the relator, T. W. Grimes, Jr., is a citizen, taxpayer, and qualified voter of the city of Salisbury,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  3. Mial v. Ellington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Gatlin v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Hinton v. . State TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirby v. NolteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Brigman v. BaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. In Re Yelton: Advisory OpinionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. In re Yelton: Advisory OpinionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API