Legal Opinion

State v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1908No. 15,972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Brown district court; WILLIAM I. Stuart, judge.

1Per curiam

It has been announced so often that if a defendant in a criminal case enter a plea of guilty it is within the discretion of the court whether it will allow the plea to be withdrawn and a plea of not guilty to be entered that the proposition does not need reiteration. Here the defendant was represented by able counsel of well-known standing at the bar from the commencement of the proceeding. Several months elapsed before arraignment. No inducement was offered or pressure brought to bear upon him from any source respecting his pleading guilty. He does not claim to be deficient in understanding…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. People v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. DownsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. State v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API