Legal Opinion
Smith v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 1975No. Civ. 14957PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.,
In 1971 provisions were added to the Unemployment Insurance Code making state employees eligible for unemployment compensation under certain conditions. The Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board has ruled that persons working for the state Employment Development Department as part-time (“intermittent”) employment and claims assistants (EGAs) could not qualify for unemployment insurance. The three petitioners, all of whom had been employed as EGAs, are claimants for unemployment compensation. They unsuccessfully challenged the appeals board ruling in the superior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Black Panther Party v. KehoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Stockton v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- ACF Industries, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tomlin v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Patrick v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Ykovchick v. Public Schools of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- North Miami General Hospital Inc. v. PlazaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Zoet v. Benson Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.