Legal Opinion

Potee v. Cook

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 29, 2021No. 2:19-cv-05058Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ANDREW POTEE, Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:19-cv-5058 - vs - Judge James L. Graham Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz THOMAS COOK, et al., : Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Andrew Potee brings this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Defendants Thomas Cook and Timothy Nungester, Ohio corrections officers. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Thomas Cook and Timothy Nungester (the “Motion”). (ECF No. 40.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
Betsy L. Nichols, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Muskingum College, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.