Legal Opinion

Houck v. Samuel Geltman & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1991No. 1586PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order entering summary judgment in favor of a defendant landowner who allegedly failed to protect his invitee from a dangerous condition existing on adjacent land. After careful review, we affirm.

On June 16, 1986, at or about 12:30 a.m., Thomas R. Houck, an Allentown policeman, responded to a complaint that trespassers were in the swimming pool at Allen Garden Apartments, an apartment complex managed by Samuel Geltman & Company. Upon arrival, Houck observed and pursued several individuals as they ran from the pool and entered a wooded area on adjoining land. When…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Rybas v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Gardner v. Consolidated Rail Corp. SEPTASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flohr v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Carey ex rel. Carey v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Okkerse v. HoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Okkerse v. HoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API