Meyer v. McDonnell
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Alvin Meyer, hereinafter called appellant, filed suit against Edmond J. McDonnell, M.D., the appellee, in Baltimore City Court, alleging that as the result of an orthopedic operation upon his back he suffered sexual impotency and a lack of bowel and bladder control. We are obliged to reverse the judgment rendered in favor of Dr. McDonnell because the trial judge instructed the jury that evidence of Dr. McDonnell’s tampering with the appellant’s witnesses was admissible only for the purpose of raising an inference that the testimony of the witnesses would be unfavorable to Dr. McDonnell, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., and Newark Newspaper Publishers' AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Dr. Finn F. L'Orange v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Maszczenski v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- McHugh v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Miller v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- DiLeo v. NugentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- McCool v. GehretSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- McDonnell v. Commission on Medical DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Arena v. SaphierNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.