Legal Opinion

Charles H. Kuiper, Sr., Mae E. Kuiper, and Charles A. Kuiper, Jr., D/B/A Charles H. Kuiper & Son Farms v. American Cyanamid Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 5, 1997No. 96-1647, 97-1657PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to decide whether the- Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Ro-denticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. §§ 136-136y, preempts state law claims alleging that a pesticide manufacturer was negligent and made false representations in marketing and promoting its product. The district court entered summary judgment for the defendant manufacturer, holding that FIFRA preempted the plaintiffs’ claims and, in the alternative, that the state statute of limitations barred plaintiffs’ statutory claim. We affirm.

I. Background

In the mid-1980s, American Cyanamid Corporation…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Abel Kaplan and Mary Lou Kaplan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Arnold v. Dow Chemical CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API