Legal Opinion
Ryerson v. Riverside Cement Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1968No. Civ. 8989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.
The People, on relation of the Public Utilities Commission, appeal from an order denying its motion for leave to intervene in an action brought by plaintiffs Ryerson and Phillips, doing business as Phillips Trucking Co. (Phillips), a highway permit carrier, against defendant Riverside Cement Company (Riverside) to recover alleged undercharges for certain shipments made in 1957.
The history of this protracted litigation may be summarized as follows:
In 1958 the Public Utilities Commission (Commission) conducted an investigation into the operations and practices of Phillips and found that it had…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Mary R. v. B. & R. CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- O'DELL v. Freightliner Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Golden Cheese Co. v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Beckstead v. International Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982