State v. Gilley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
By the first assignment of error argued in his brief, defendant contends that the trial court erred in excluding certain testimony which defendant attempted to extract from Simpson, the alleged victim, on cross examination. This assignment has no merit.
The record reveals the following:
Q. Isn’t it true, Mr. Simpson, that you are a homosexual?
MR. XANTHOS: Objection.
A. That is no.
COURT: Just a minute.
The jury will retire while the Court hears a matter concerning the law which must be heard out of your presence. Don’t talk about the case while you’re out.
(At this time the jury went…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.