Rooker v. Rimer
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
HIGHERS, Judge.
The plaintiff, Lee Rooker, has appealed a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Robert W. Rimer, in a paternity action in the Circuit Court of Shelby County.
Rooker alleges that she and Rimer engaged in sexual intercourse on July 2,1971, and that she engaged in no other sexual intercourse in June, July and August of 1971. In January of 1972, Rooker married another man and on April 7, 1972, gave birth to a son giving him the name of her husband and the designation “Jr.”
*126Rooker divorced her husband in July of 1979, and in December of 1985, she filed a petition against Rimer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Hudson v. CappsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Gustin v. GustinOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. MurrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
- Cunningham v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Terry v. NiblackTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Yvette D. WoodyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- Tom and Karen Moore v. Lloyd A. Walwyn, M.D. - DissentingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996