Legal Opinion

Fortt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 1995No. 94-02739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we have found no error affecting Fortt’s conviction; however, we strike certain costs and certain probation conditions imposed by the trial court.

First, a cost of $300 was assessed by the trial court referencing no statutory authority. *638Under Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), it is mandatory for a trial court to provide the statutory basis for every cost item imposed. Accordingly, this cost must be stricken. On remand, the state may seek to reimpose appropriate costs in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Nank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Vinyard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Drinnon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cherubin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. V.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. VD v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API