Horstman v. State
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LeGRAND, Justice.
Following his conviction for breaking and entering, petitioner was sentenced under section 708.8, The Code, to serve a term of not more than 10 years in the Men’s Reformatory.
He seeks to escape that penalty by two distinct and separate avenues. First, he appeals from denial of his application for postconviction relief under chapter 663A, The Code. On the issues thus raised, we affirm the trial court.
Secondly, having failed to perfect an appeal from the judgment sentencing him to a term in the reformatory, he has now filed an application for permission to take a delayed appeal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. WetzelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- State v. WisniewskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State v. WieseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moore v. StampsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Swanson v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Cleesen v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. HorstmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.