Legal Opinion

State v. Wiese

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1972No. 55456, 55455PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

These consolidated appeals arise from a resentencing proceeding. Defendants claim they were sentenced under the wrong statute. We agree and reverse and remand for new sentencing.

Defendants were tried and convicted separately for selling marijuana in violation of § 204.2, The Code, 1966. In March 1970 they were each fined $2000 and ordered imprisoned in the state penitentiary “not less than two or more than five years” under § 204.20, The Code, 1966. They took direct appeal but raised no question about their sentences. The cases were affirmed in State v. Wiese, 182 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. State v. RandolphNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. United States v. Simeon Jessamy CokeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. State v. PardonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. OhnmachtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Honomichl v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. FarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. State v. BurtlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API