Legal Opinion
Markel v. City of Circle Pines
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 15, 1991No. C4-90-1444PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Relator obtained a writ of certiorari seeking review of a decision by the Department *409of Jobs and Training (Department). Relator argues he did not commit misconduct for unemployment compensation purposes when he lost his driver’s license and could no longer effectively perform his job duties. We disagree and affirm,
FACTS
Relator Edward Markel was employed as a utilities worker by respondent City of Circle Pines between April 1989 and January 1990. Markel’s job required that he drive a City van or pickup truck. When Markel was hired, he was told he would need a valid…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Chellson v. State Division of Employment & SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Markel v. City of Circle PinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Markel v. City of Circle PinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Markel v. City of Circle PinesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991