Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Gifford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 1980No. 79-4-153, CA 16675PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

In this dissolution case, husband contends that the trial court’s division of the parties’ property was inequitable, that the award to wife of $750 per month permanent spousal support was unwarranted, and that the judgment given in favor of wife’s attorney for fees was improper. Wife cross-appeals, requesting an increase in her award.

The parties were married for twenty-nine years. Husband is 49 years old and wife is 46. Husband enjoys good health and is employed as a shift supervisor, with a gross salary of $3,100 per month. Wife, on the other hand, lacks a high school degree, has virtually…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KitsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. In re the Marriage of GlattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of FeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. In re the Marriage of ButtenhoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. In re the Marriage of TannlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Matter of Marriage of GoebelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of FerranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API