Legal Opinion

Hite v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1918No. 11973PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Coles county; the Hon. John H. Marshall, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooke

court:

On March 20, 1880, Charles A. Hite and wife, Marcus Hite and wife, and Mrs, L. E. Hite, conveyed a strip of land in Coles county to the Danville, Olney and Ohio River Railroad. Company for and in consideration of the free transportation of the grantors and R. L. Hite, a son of Charles A. Hite, during their natural lives, upon all trains carrying passengers over that railroad. The railroad company took possession of the real estate and used it as a part of its right of way, and the contract was kept by the company and its successors until December 31, 1915? when appellees, the successors…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. City of Chicago v. O'ConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Cowley v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Quincy Railway Co. v. City of QuincyIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. MinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  5. Illinois Commerce Commission Ex Rel. Illinois Traction, Inc. v. Omphghent TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API