Shannon v. Chambers
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
STECKLER, Chief Judge.
This cause came before the court upon the motion of the defendants to dismiss the action on the grounds that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action. In the alternative, defendant Indianapolis Stockyards Company moves to strike certain allegations in Count I of the complaint and for a more definite statement. After considering the motions, together with the briefs in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and being duly advised in the premises, the court concludes that the motion to dismiss should be sustained.
The action is in three…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mccleneghan v. Union Stock Yards Co. Of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Litvak Meat Co. v. Denver Union Stock Yard Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1969