Legal Opinion

M. L. Stewart & Co. v. Marcus

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bijur, J.:

This action is brought to charge a trust upon, and direct a conveyance of, certain property in favor of and to plaintiff upon the following state of facts: Plaintiff, M. L. Stewart & Co., Inc., had prior to September, 1923, been a depositor in the Bank of the United States, of which defendant Marcus was vice-president. Another corporation, The Russek Company, was also a depositor in the bank. As early as May, 1923, the Russeks learned that the property at the cornet of Fifth avenue and Thirty-seventh street, known as the Gorham store, was for sale and made an offer for its purchase.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Ryan v. . DoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dolton v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Pigg v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Rubenstein v. South Denver National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Washington Steel Corp. v. TW Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Renshaw v. Tracy Loan & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API