Legal Opinion

Process Control Corporation v. V. Hydreclaim Corporation, Defendant-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 25, 1999No. 98-1082, 98-1277PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Process Control Corporation (“Process Control”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Docket No. 93-CV-2795, wherein the district court sustained the validity and enforceability of U.S. Patent No. 5,148,943 owned by HydReclaim Corporation (“HydReclaim”), and found that Process Control had willfully infringed certain claims of that patent. Because the district court erred in its construction of the claims at issue and because the claims as written and correctly construed are invalid, we reverse the district court’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Exxon Research and Engineering Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Crown Operations International, Ltd. And Marshall H. Krone v. Solutia Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API