Legal Opinion
Polycast Technology Corp. v. Rohm & Haas Company
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided April 30, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLCOTT, Chief Justice:
The plaintiff in this case seeks recovery of the contract price of chemicals which it sold to the defendants, Polycast Technology and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Cast Optics.
Plaintiff extended a line of credit to defendants in order to enable them to finance the purchase. Defendants admit they owe the amount charged to be due, but assert anti-trust defenses to the action.
Plaintiff moved for summary judgment which the Superior Court granted. The Opinion below is reported at 297 A.2d 53. We affirm for the reasons stated therein.
The Superior Court correctly held that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Merritt Dickstein v. Edmond Dupont, as They Are Partners of Francis I. Dupont & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Plekowski v. Ralston Purina Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1975
- Universal Studios Inc. v. Viacom Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1997
- Azalea Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. SargoySupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Lupofresh, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985