Legal Opinion
Lupofresh, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided December 30, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON CROSS MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT-GRANTED IN PART
TAYLOR, Judge.
These suits involve contracts for the sale of hops by plaintiff to defendant. 1 Each contract specified a quantity of a specified kind of hops, and a price. The affidavit of George Seidenberger, a vice president of plaintiff, sets forth the documents and facts relied upon by plaintiff. According to this affidavit, plaintiff processed and stored the hops and informed defendant that the hops were ready for delivery in accordance with the contracts, but defendant refused to take delivery.
The defendant’s memorandum…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Data Documents, Inc. v. Pottawattamie CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. John I. Haas, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986