Perez v. Cain
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.
*619The question presented by this post-conviction appeal is whether petitioner's claim that a juvenile court "must find that [a] youth possesses sufficient adult-like intellectual, social and emotional capabilities to have an adult-like understanding of the significance of his or her conduct, including its wrongfulness and its consequences for the *507youth, the victim and others" in order to waive a youth into adult court under ORS 419C.349, as required under State v. J. C. N.-V. , 359 Or. 559, 597, 380 P.3d 248 (2016), is one that he reasonably could have raised in his earlier post-conviction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Chavez v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perez v. CainOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Perez v. CainDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023