Legal Opinion

Perez v. Cain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 2019No. A164434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.

*619The question presented by this post-conviction appeal is whether petitioner's claim that a juvenile court "must find that [a] youth possesses sufficient adult-like intellectual, social and emotional capabilities to have an adult-like understanding of the significance of his or her conduct, including its wrongfulness and its consequences for the *507youth, the victim and others" in order to waive a youth into adult court under ORS 419C.349, as required under State v. J. C. N.-V. , 359 Or. 559, 597, 380 P.3d 248 (2016), is one that he reasonably could have raised in his earlier post-conviction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chapman v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Chavez v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perez v. CainOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Perez v. CainDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API