Legal Opinion
Boomer v. Bruno
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 27, 2001No. 1:00-cv-00561PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
KAHN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss brought by defendants Hines, Vardine, and Mercado (“Defendants”). For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
On or about December 20, 1996, defendants Vardine and Mercado were allegedly involved in an undercover operation conducted by members of the New York State Police (“NYSP”) wherein they posed as drug purchasers and bought drugs from an unidentified suspect. According to the alleged standard procedure of the operation, the suspect was not arrested at the time…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brogdon v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Fortunatus v. Clinton CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Bristol v. Town of CamdenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Jeanty v. Blue RhinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Jeanty v. Bottini Fuel OilDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.