Legal Opinion

Midland-Ross Corp. v. Rosenthal

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1982No. 64131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellee-plaintiff was engaged in the course of his employment when “something got caught” in a piece of machinery manufactured by appellant-defendant. Appellee’s arm was pulled into the machine and he received extensive injuries. Appellee instituted the instant action, seeking a recovery against appellant in negligence and in strict liability. The case was tried before a jury, and a verdict was returned for appellee. Appellant appeals, enumerating as error the denial of its motion for a directed verdict.

“Code Ann. § 81A-150 provides that... a motion [for directed verdict] will…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speir v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Beam v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Brooks v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Long Manufacturing, N. C., Inc. v. Grady Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Inta-Roto, Inc. v. GuestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Holmes v. St. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Southeast Schokbeton, Inc. v. Katz Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API