Legal Opinion
United States v. Warren Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 13, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 84-1502-YPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
YOUNG, District Judge.
This is a case brought under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq. On September 30, 1982 the defendant, Warren Corporation (“Warren”), entered into a contract with the United States Department of the Army (the “Army”) for the reconstruction of a roadway at Fort Devens, Ayer, Massachusetts (the “contract”). As required by the Miller Act, Warren provided a performance bond and a payment bond covering the work to be performed at Fort Devens. The defendant, third-party plaintiff, National Grange Mutual Insurance Company (“National Grange”), was the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. ShannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Massaro v. Vernitron Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- Aetna Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Seaboard Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of P.J. Keating Company v. Warren Corporation, National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- 34 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 75,340, 25 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 169 United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Seaboard Surety Company and the Home Insurance Company, Cross-Appellees. Seaboard Surety Company and the Home Insurance Company, Defendants-Third-Party v. Joseph Morton Company, Inc., Joseph J. Battaglia, and the Perkins & Will Partnership, Third-Party-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Jung v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988