Legal Opinion

Brashear v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 11, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00505Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL BRASHEAR, et al., ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0505 - NONE JLT ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 v. ) COMPEL ARBITRATION ) 14 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ) (Doc. 10) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) 17 Michael Brashear, Benito Contreras, Kenneth Dollar, Terry Foster, and Ricardo Rodriguez are 18 employed by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. and seek to hold their employer liable for wage and 19 hour violations under California law. (See Doc. 1) Halliburton…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API