Legal Opinion

Lunde v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1913No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hally, J. Case- by Emily Lunde against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This cause, which on the trial below resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, arises from a claim made by plaintiff that she sus-» tained injuries from being thrown to the pavement by the starting of one of defendant’s cars as she was about to board it at the corner of Michigan avenue and Shelby street in the qity of Detroit. The errors relied upon on this appeal relate to the cross-examination of the plaintiff and the charge of the court.

Counsel for defendant, on cross-examination, sought to show her relations with a man named Lori*376mer, which testimony was excluded upon objection…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. People v. GotshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Knickerbocker v. WorthingMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Clark v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Van Goosen v. BarlumMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. FinksMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. La LondeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Anthony v. CochraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API