Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1980No. 50670PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

Donald Wayne Martin appeals from an order denying his petition for postconviction relief which requested a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The sole issue is whether the postconviction court abused its discretion by refusing to grant the petition. Where credible newly discovered evidence is so material as to make probable a different result on retrial, a new trial may be required. We conclude, however, that the newly discovered evidence in this case does not meet these criteria and that, therefore, the trial court acted properly in denying relief.

On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. St. ChristopherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State v. KlotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Vikse v. FlabySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API