Legal Opinion

Sarginson v. Turner Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1912No. 10072PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered May 27, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendant, dismissing an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action by William Sarginson against H. S. Turner Investment Company, a corporation, and others, to foreclose a single lien for labor and materials, furnished in the construction of four dwelling houses, upon lots in the city of Seattle belonging to the defendant corporation. From a judgment of dismissal, the plaintiff has appealed.

The controlling issue of fact is whether one Okey J. Gregg, with whom appellant claims a contract for the erection of the buildings, was the architect and agent of the H. S. Turner Investment Company. The trial court found that he was not, that appellant had no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knudson-Jacob Co. v. BrandtWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carstens Packing Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Erickson v. PericaWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Herren v. Kansas City Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API