Legal Opinion

Lee and Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 24, 1940No. 4173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

The appellants were changed by information with' the offenses of burglary and grand larceny. They were convicted and duly sentenced. Several instructions were requested by the appellants, only one of which was given. It is argued on the part of the State that the objections made to the court’s refusal to give all these instructions were en masse. If any instruction was bad, the court’s ruling was correct. It has been so decided, in principle, in the case of Long v. State, 140 Ark. 413, 216 S. W. 306. On the matter as there presented it was held that the exception cannot avail unless all the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pulaski County v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. State v. HumphreysWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Beller v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Klimas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Thacker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. Gatewood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API