Legal Opinion

George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 29, 2019No. 3:17-cv-08200Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Rosita George, No. CV-17-08200-PCT-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Plaintiff Rosita George seeks judicial review of an administrative decision by 17 Defendant Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (“ONHIR”) denying her 18 relocation benefits under the Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act. (Doc. 1.) The parties have filed 19 cross motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 28, 32.) The motions are fully briefed, and 20 oral argument will not aid the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Dilcia Reyes De Valle v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Jose M. Sarvia-Quintanilla v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. River Runners for Wilderness v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API