Legal Opinion

FMI, INC. v. RMax, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 26, 1985No. 0529PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

This case involves a type action novel to this State but addressed by our Commercial Codes. It is a contract action under § 36-2-709, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976). The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, FMI, Inc., (the seller). We affirm.

In pertinent part § 36-2-709 is as follows:

§ 36-2-709. Action for the price.(1) When the buyer fails to pay the price as it becomes due the seller may recover, together with any incidental damages under the next section (§ 36-2-710), the price(b) of goods identified to the contract if the seller is unable after reasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Southern Railway, Carolina Div.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. O'Neal v. Carolina Farm Supply of Johnston, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Multi-Line Manufacturing, Inc. v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Decker Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. Weisz Graphics Division of the Fred B. Johnson Co. v. Peck Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Royal Jones & Assocs., Inc. v. First Thermal Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API