Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1981No. 852, September Term, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

Apparently aggrieved at appellee’s acquittal by a jury in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on narcotic charges, an Assistant State’s Attorney opted to reopen a stet in another case that had been entered as the result of a plea bargain. The appellee, Robert Lee Thompson, vigorously resisted the effort to reopen the stet and filed a "Motion to Enforce a Plea Agreement.” The matter was heard before Judge Joseph I. Pines, and he granted the appellee’s motion. The State appealed.

The single issue posited by the State is "[w]hether the trial court erred in dismissing the criminal informations against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Sinclair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Sturgis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. E. SIFRIT v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. State v. HoweNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API