Legal Opinion

State v. Maynard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2015No. 89786-7PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 The State charged Christopher Nelson Maynard in juvenile court with six counts of malicious mischief. Less than one month later, he turned 18 years old. Maynard’s counsel did not move for an order to extend the court’s statutory jurisdiction as provided in RCW 13.40-.300(l)(a) before Maynard turned 18. As a result, the juvenile court ruled that it had lost jurisdiction and dismissed the case without prejudice. The State then filed the case in superior court. Maynard moved to dismiss, arguing that preaccusatorial delay and ineffective assistance of counsel deprived him of the benefits of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WatkinsWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Davison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State Of Washington, V Ross Anthony BurkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington, App/cross-respondent v. Daniel L. Keen, Resp/crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington, Appellant/cross-respondent v. J.j.w.d., Respondent/crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API