Legal Opinion

King County v. King County Water Dists.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2019No. 96360-6Published

1Opinion of the Court

yF ^ IN CLERKS OFFICE This opinion was fiied for record lUFRBE COURT,SWIE OF mSHINQTOM DEC fl 5 till at^a.iK.on7?^^. DWTE. OdA \AAA^ t ^ Susan L. Carlson GHIBFJUSriCe Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY, NO. 96360-6 Appellant, V. EN BANC KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICTS Nos. 20, 45,49, 90, 111, 119, 125, CEDAR RIVER WATER AND SEWER Filed flFr II !i 3 DISTRICT, COAL CREEK UTILITY DISTRICT, COVINGTON WATER DISTRICT,FALL CITY WATER DISTRICT, HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT,LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT, NE SAMMAMISH SEWER AND WATER…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API