Bayles v. Marriott
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, Brenda Bayles (along with her husband Mitch Bayles, who has a derivative claim) appeals from a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") entered by the trial court in favor of the defendants Deborah Marriott, Carolyn Ellis, Beth Barnes, and Kelly Hudson. Following a four-day trial, at which the evidence on behalf of Bayles was presented, the trial court granted the defendants' motion for a JML. Bayles appealed to the supreme court; that court transferred the appeal to this court, pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code, 1975.
On appeal Bayles contends that the trial court erred in entering…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. RoushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Martin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- James Hill v. Madison County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Ex Parte SpiveySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Auburn UniversitySupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Segrest v. LewisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MasonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.