Ex Parte Spivey
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Heath Wright and his parents, Betty Wright and Solomon Wright,1 sued Donald Spivey, Jerry Peacock, and others, on theories of negligence and wantonness for injuries Heath sustained while operating a stationary spindle wood shaper in a building-construction class at a public school. Peacock and Spivey each moved for a summary judgment, arguing, among other things, that they were entitled to State-agent immunity. The trial court denied their summary-judgment…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte RizkSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- James Hill v. Madison County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Giambrone v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte NallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte HaylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.