Legal Opinion

Carmen J. Cardona v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 11, 2014No. 11-3083PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The appellant appeals through counsel an August 30, 2011, Board of Veterans’ Appeal (Board) decision that denied additional compensation for a dependent spouse under 38 U.S.C. § 1115 (Additional compensation for dependents). The Board denied the claim because the appellant’s spouse under Connecticut law — who is of the same sex as appellant — is not a spouse for purposes of VA benefits. See 38 U.S.C. § 101(31) (“The term ‘spouse’ means a person of the opposite sex who is a wife or husband.”).

On appeal, the appellant challenged section 101(31) and section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act…

3Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amanda Jane Wolfe and Peter E. Boerschinger v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
  2. Gary Philbrook v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2020
  3. James A. Godsey, Jr. v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API