Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 2000No. S-97-986PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
Andrew Scott Baldwin filed the instant action against the City of Omaha (City) under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1991 & Cum. Supp. 1992), in which he seeks recovery for injuries sustained *3from a confrontation with the Omaha police on September 5, 1992. Following a bench trial, the district court found that there were two causes of the injuries suffered by Baldwin on September 5: the negligence of the City and the contributory negligence of Baldwin for discontinuing his prescribed medication while aware of the risks of doing so. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Kozeny v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Kozicki v. DragonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Harrison v. SeagrovesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kozlov v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Robert Wade and Archway Cookies, Llc, Doing Business as Specialty FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Brandon v. County of RichardsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Fickle v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Aguallo v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.