Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Friedman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 26, 2001No. Nos. 00-9595(CON), 00-9597(CON)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiffs-appellants Abraham Friedman, Eliazar Bloshteyn, and Sofiya Bloshteyn, are members of a class action brought against various Swiss banking institutions and entities (the “Swiss Banks”) to obtain redress for their various actions in profiting from the Holocaust. They appeal from the November 22, 2000 order of the district court approving the Special Master’s plan to allocate $1.25 billion in funds that have been obtained through an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,397 Lawrence J. Beecher v. Charles R. Able, and Four Other Actions, McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,642 Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Robert HelfandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re: Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation Abraham Friedman, Eliazar Bloshteyn, and Sofiya Bloshteyn v. Jacob Friedman, Union Bank of Switzerland, Swiss Bank Corporation, Credit Suisse, and Swiss Bankers AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re Holocaust Victim Assets LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Holocaust Victim Assets LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Holocaust Victim Assets LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- In Re Holocaust Victim Assets LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.