Legal Opinion
Perrott v. Leahy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 2, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
Verdicts for the plaintiffs were returned in these two actions of tort for personal injuries arising out of the alleged negligence of the defendants’ agent or servant. The only exceptions of the defendants that have been argued relate to three matters of evidence.
1. The defendants did business under the name and style of M. W. Leahy Co. The tax collector of the town of Littleton testified without objection that he had the records of registration of automobiles for 1933; that “registration B-25496 was taxed” to the Leahy company; and that there were over twenty trucks assessed to the Leahy…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Robbins v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Robinson v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Stowe v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Taylor v. WhittierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lawrence E. Kitchen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Leave v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- McGeorge v. Grand Realty Trust, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Commonwealth v. CataldoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Hale v. DodgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.