Ober v. Seegmiller
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Winneshiek District Court. — W. J. Springer, Judge. These cases, while not submitted together, involve the same propositions of law and fact, and will be disposed of in one opinion. They are each garnishment proceedings, in which the parties named were garnished as supposed debtors of Jacob Seegmiller, on an execution issued on a judgment held by plaintiff against said Seegmiller. The trial court held the garnishees liable, and they appeal.—
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
1. Wills : construction : estate created: obligation of another: garnishment. devisee to pay The garnishees are the sons of Jacob Seegmiller, the judgment defendant. Plaintiffs each held judgments against the father, and they caused the sons to be garnished on executions issued on *464these judgments. This indebtedness to the father, if there be one, arises out of the will of their mother, from which we extract the following:
“To my beloved husband, Jacob Seegmiller, I give and bequeath so much of and such part of the sum of $1,000 each year during the period of his natural lifetime as he may be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meek v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Robertson v. SchardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Hunter v. Citizens Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Wright v. MahaffeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- State Bank v. SchuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Isaac Van Dyke Co. v. MollMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Darling v. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Malone v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Pfeffer v. FinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Standard Chemical Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.