Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. State

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 2009No. 28175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

WATANABE, J.

This appeal arises from an inverse-condemnation lawsuit filed by Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28, Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 29, and Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 38 1 (collectively, Plaintiffs), on behalf of themselves and all non-governmental owners of oceanfront real property in Hawaii on and/or after May 19, 2003 (oceanfront, littoral, or riparian owners), challenging the constitutionality of Act 73, 2003 Haw. Sess. Laws at 128 (Act 73). Plaintiffs alleged that Act 73:

a. Took oceanfront owners’ rights to claim accreted land (other than that which restored…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dw Aina Le'a Development, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use CommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API