Bradshaw v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pope Circuit Court.. ■William L..Moose, Judge. The amount of alcohol in the drink, as shown by the proof, is not sufficient to bring its sale within the meaning of the statute.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, J.
The appellant, Henry Bradshaw, was tried and convicted under an indictment charging him with the unlawful sale, without license, of certain liquor.
No objection has been made, either here or below, to the form of the' indictment, and the proof was directed to a sale by appellant of a compound or preparation called “Uno,” containing alcohol. It was agreed at the trial below that appellant had sold this preparation as a' beverage, without license; “that it has the general appearance of beer; foams, sparkles, and has the color and taste of beer; that a person could not contain enough of it to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sawyer v. BottiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Nies v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Seibert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Brownson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909