Legal Opinion

State v. Watkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1992PublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether the warrantless police search of an automobile passenger compartment violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. That question turns on whether the search was incident to a lawful arrest or was an unreasonable inventory search. The defendant, George Prince Watkins, Jr., was convicted of possession of an electrical device with a defaced serial number and possession of a controlled substance, both of which were products of the search in question and the object of a motion to suppress, which the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. State v. YearganTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. KeithTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State of Tennessee v. Christopher Lee DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. EnglandTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API