Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Berry

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 29, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The life of the doctrine of the trust receipt has been characterized as a short but adventurous one. 36 Harv. Law Rev. 229.

Professor Williston in the second edition of his work on Sales, published in 1924, says (p. 797): “It seems probable that if the practice-of permitting validity to unrecorded liens by way of trust receipts is, to continue, limits must be fixed either judicially or by statute to the-kinds of transactions in which such receipts may be used. At present, the question has not been fully considered how far public policy should permit such a secret title to prevail over general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simons v. Northeastern Finance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Duffy v. CharakSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Seattle Ass'n of Credit MenWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Habegger v. SkallaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Mullen v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API