Legal Opinion

City of Ottawa v. Hulse

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1928No. 17730. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is prosecuted by defendant from a judgment of the county court of LaSalle county confirming a special assessment for a paving improvement in the city of Ottawa. The ordinance at bar provides, and two former improvement ordinances of February 18, 1924, and July 8, 1925, each provided, for the paving of Adams street, a north and south street, from a line 150 feet north of the north line of Houston street to the south line of Glover street, and also for paving Houston, Center and Glover streets, east and west streets, from Marcy street westward to the east line of the Adams street…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. NodeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Carlinville v. McClureIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gorton v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Gage v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. City of Ottawa v. HulseIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Contest of the Election for the Offices of GovernorIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Midway Tobacco Co. v. MahinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. People v. WilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District v. City of BrooklynOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Paterson v. City of GraniteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API