Legal Opinion

City of Ottawa v. Hulse

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1925No. 16566. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

This appeal is from a judgment of the county court of LaSalle county overruling objections and confirming a special assessment levied to pay the cost of paving a street within the city of Ottawa.

The city of Ottawa has adopted the commission form of municipal government. Section 33 of the act providing for the government of such cities requires that “Every ordinance or resolution appropriating any money or ordering any street improvement * * * shall remain on file with the city or village clerk for public inspection, complete in form in which it is finally passed, at least one week before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLean v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Village of Bellwood v. Latrobe Steel & Coupler Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Village of Crotty v. DommIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. City of Ottawa v. HulseIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. City of Dallas City v. SteingraberIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Zion v. Christian Catholic ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API