Legal Opinion

State v. L. C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 2010No. 7256J; Petition Numbers 7256J3, 7256J4; A143200; 7257J; Petition Numbers 7257J3, 7257J4; A143201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

The state appeals from permanency judgments concerning two children. In those judgments, the juvenile court changed the permanency plan for the children from “APPLA” — that is, “another planned permanent living arrangement”1 — to adoption and ordered the Department of Human Services (DHS) to file petitions to terminate mother’s and father’s parental rights; the court declined to find that DHS had made reasonable efforts. In this unusual case, father and mother support, while DHS opposes, a permanency plan of adoption. We conclude that, because the record as of the permanency hearing shows…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Koennecke v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. T. L.Marion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. Department of Human Services v. M. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Department of Human Services v. T. M. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. LCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API