Legal Opinion

McDanel v. Mack Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1934No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The appellant, R. B. McDanel, brought this action in assumpsit against the Mack Realty Company (hereinafter called “Realty Company”) and the G. C. Murphy Company (hereinafter called “Murphy Company”) for damages sustained by the breach of a written agreement of lease. In the course of the trial the appellant was nonsuited as to Murphy Company. By award of the jury the appellant succeeded against Realty Company. The verdict was $4,152.60. A motion for judgment n. o. v. was made and granted. Plaintiff appealed.

In 1929 Realty Company owned a four-story brick building…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gorman v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Prescott v. OtterstatterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  3. Sutton v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Pugh v. HolmesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. TM Carlton House Partners v. Career Planners, Inc. (In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Holmes Realty Trust v. Granite City Storage Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API